| home / today's asian business strategy ezine / columns / asia pacific management news index / |
|
|
|
Anwar Newsweek's Asian of the Year
30th December 1998
Back to News Menu | Of the major Asian news magazines, Newsweek has maintained the most deliberate pro-Anwar policy in the last six months, focussing on the need for reform in Malaysia, and on Anwar as its most visible leader. Some of the more controversial quotes from the article and interview which accompanied the announcement of the award.
Ugly as the trial is, Malaysian's know the real fight is in the political arena. It is about the wrath of a conservative old man and the liberal protégé who dared to challenge him. It is about the clash between a rebel fighting the colonial demons of yesteryear and his would-be successor, a man of the world who espouses univeral values and the global village. Anwar is no Mahatma Ghandi. He is a wily, determined politician fighting not just for survival but for power. It is the larger battle that he personifies - between old and new politics in East Asia, authoritarian and democratic governments, protected and open economies - that makes him NEWSWEEK's Asian of the year.1999 will give us some idea of the real influence that Anwar's 1988 had on Malaysia. As Mahathir's Malaysia continues to show good signs of a recovery under his new economic rules, and the government's campaign to discredit and marginalise Anwar shows every sign of success, Newsweek may well for now, have over-estimated Anwar's influence. The initial public statements of support from leaders of other Asian countries have halted, the demonstrations have ceased, and it seems very much like "business as usual" on the streets of Kuala Lumpur. US Vice President's foray into Malaysian politics by making a speech apparantly supporting Anwar supporters was seen a personal insult by many Malaysian's and reinforced Mahathir's argument that the West is agin Malaysia. A nationalistic and patriotic campaign followed where the not-too-subtle message was that to be a patriotic Malaysian you needed to support Mahathir. Mahathir goes into 1999 with his local credibility recovered. Anwar is still in the joint. The "reformasi" movement, (another term which many Malaysian's object to as suggesting an association with Indonesia and not being an actual Bahasa Malaysian word itself), is taking a rest for Ramadam, and all we hear from the trial is about stained mattresses. Just for now, the "conservative old man" is firmly entrenched and the Malaysian elite have withstood their first major challenge. It has been acheived in many ways, formally and informally, estranging Malaysia from the outside world.. plus a good measure of good old fashioned traditional Asian influence peddling, which the Malaysian elite have proven to be the masters of. So where does that leave the ordinary Malaysian, and those who do business in or with Malaysia? Isolationist currency controls and other economic policies have inevitably led to a recovery of the Malaysian stock market with the inflow of Ringgit, restricted outflows, and an economy which can be directed more by the nation state than the global economy. The leadership have shown they can resist the political effects of a major crash and recession by time worn methods. The encumbent élite has got a repreive. In the time-limited vacuum provided, will the necessary changes be made to build a stronger Malaysia for the global future, or is it just business as usual while the hard answers are only delayed for the future? Maybe Newsweek could have followed Time's approach who named two gents Men of the Year.. both Clinton and Starr. For who has been the better teacher? Anwar who taught Malaysian's to ask the hard questions, or Mahathir who taught us what happens to those who do?
|
| email updates | email this page | discuss | search | today's asian business strategy news | advertise | about |
| daily asian news, research & commentary for the international business strategy, market research & strategic management professional |